Why these three comparison tables are shown

These tables were generated from three different AI perspectives in order to provide an external and balanced comparison between CES and traditional structural methods such as FEM.

The purpose is not to oppose CES to FEM. FEM remains fundamental for local analysis, detailed verification and code compliance. CES complements it by adding a broader structural interpretation of the machine and its behaviour over time.

Each AI has its own style of reasoning and emphasis. For this reason, the three tables are intentionally shown together: not as a competition between methods, but as multiple independent viewpoints highlighting the same central idea:
CES and FEM are complementary, and CES adds meaningful value across the full life cycle of the machine.